While it is true that this is an encyclopedic article and not a strategy guide, I do feel that much of the information on this page is encyclopedic. Often used for Magic Finding.") would be appropriate, along with the explanation of other common game terms, but the builds' strengths and weaknesses should not be discussed here. The rest of the points are typically spent on the appropriate synergies and masteries along with teleport and static charge. I think a list of common builds, with a very brief description of what they are (example: "Meteorb sorceress: A sorceress mainly relying on the meteor, frozen orb and fireball spells. I think the main issue is that character build evaluations are a rather subjective topic (since it is often based on an individual's gaming experience rather than some hard cold facts) and as such doesn't really have a place in an encyclopedia. The ideal would be to create a "Diablo 2 Strategies" section or page, and move everything to that section/page. If strategies have to be present, we should at least get some standardised structure to place it in, otherwise it becomes messy. This is not a strategy guide, it should give information about the game, not neccesarily how it should be played. Even though strategies used in a game does play an important role, I don't think that the strategies should be on this page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |